Raport bieżący nr 7/2019
ENEFI Energy Efficiency Plc. (“Company”) hereby informs its Honourable Investors that on
the basis of Paragraph (2), Article 57. of the Capital Market Act if false data is published
about the issuer, then it shall be obliged to publish the real data.
As opposed to the information published on Index.hu portal yesterday (31/01/2019) in the
article titled “MNB (Central Bank of Hungary) pay back the fine amounting to HUF million it
charged on a company” (https://index.hu/gazdasag/2019/01/31/mnb_enefi_buntetes/ ) MNB
had not fined the Company (ENEFI) but a subsidiary thereof (EETEK) and a private person in
its decision mentioned. Let us also call attention that therefore in case of the reimbursement of
the fine it shall not be made to the Company.
The Company fulfilled its statutory obligation by its announcement made yesterday and shall
not intend to continue media communication fights with the authorities. Let us note that in
addition to publishing the decision on its website, the authority is not obliged to conduct
intense media representation about each stage of the proceedings (filing, decision, opinions on
court decisions) as seen in this case.
It is not by any means reassuring for the Company as a market player that although the court
of justice declared about the decision of MNB that it is not suitable to establish infringement
or to charge fines, the infringements set forth in the decisions are not proven to be founded,
the decision is deficient, contradictory and the reason-cause relations are not clarified, the
authority - seeking media - declares that “they are convinced about the lawfulness of their
decision+ and repeatedly declares its opinion related to the case contradicting the court
decision without any obligation whatsoever to do so.
As a consequence of the foregoing the Company has no doubts that it had been decided
irrespectively of the court decision even prior to the commencement of the new proceedings
that the authority will insist on its conclusions and the case will be continued. Thus the
Company thinks that the fine due back shall not remain on the accounts of the involved
parties for a long time.
According to the view of the Company, it is not possible in this case to request the revision by
the Curia as the next step.
|PODPISY OSÓB REPREZENTUJĄCYCH SPÓŁKĘ|
|Data||Imię i Nazwisko||Stanowisko/Funkcja||Podpis|
|2019-02-02||Csaba Soós||Board of Directors|