Reklama

ESTAR (EST): Announcement - raport 52

Raport bieżący nr 52/2021

Podstawa Prawna:
History

As the Company had previously announced, the Central Bank of Hungary (MNB) started

Market Supervision Proceedings against the Company in 2020 in which it was revised

whether the relevant provisions of the governing law on market manipulation were violated

by the latest capital increase and in terms of the announcement related thereto. The Central

Bank of Hungary later decided to approve the prospectus of the launch of the shares at the

Budapest Stock Exchange issued during the capital increase and it concluded with its former

Reklama

decision No: N-KE-III-227/2021 that ‘MNB did not explore any relevant circumstance given

the Market Supervision Proceedings which could significantly affect the decision of MNB to

be made upon the approval of the Prospectus prepared to launch the shares at the

regulated market, MNB decided to terminate the suspension of the Proceedings and to

continue it” (quotation from the decision).

MNB decision

In the executive part of decision No H-PJ-III-16/2021 of the Central Bank of Hungary on the

Market Supervision Proceedings, issued on 11 October 2021 and received by the Company

from its legal representative on 18 October 2021, the MNB prohibited the Company to

repeat the behaviour implementing the violation of law set out in the decision, namely the

violation of legal regulations on the prohibition of market manipulation set out in the

regulation of the European Union on market abuse.

MNB found the application of the prohibition of repeating the behaviour implementing the

violation of law as ‘necessary and also sufficient measure’ (quotation from the decision).

The behaviour objected to by MNB is that according to the decision, in case of some of the

asset elements involved in the capital increase (real estates), the Company was unable to

prove that ‘documented, later presentable real estate valuation had been made before the

announcement or the sale and purchase of the real estates’ (quotation from the decision).

The Company points out that according to the conclusion of MNB the ‘logics and method

(presented by the Company later in the proceedings) for preparing decisions made for the

purchase of the real estates is acceptable and the relevant purchase prices are also

acceptable’ (quotation from the decision), furthermore the value of the real estates was

later confirmed by an external specialist as well.

The Company disputes that it would have violated the law.

PODPISY OSÓB REPREZENTUJĄCYCH SPÓŁKĘ
DataImię i NazwiskoStanowisko/FunkcjaPodpis
2021-11-18Csaba SoósBoard of Directors

Załączniki

Archiwum.zip

Reklama

Reklama

Reklama

Reklama

Strona główna INTERIA.PL

Polecamy

Rekomendacje

Finanse / Giełda / Podatki
Bądź na bieżąco!
Odblokuj reklamy i zyskaj nieograniczony dostęp do wszystkich treści w naszym serwisie.
Dzięki wyświetlanym reklamom korzystasz z naszego serwisu całkowicie bezpłatnie, a my możemy spełniać Twoje oczekiwania rozwijając się i poprawiając jakość naszych usług.
Odblokuj biznes.interia.pl lub zobacz instrukcję »
Nie, dziękuję. Wchodzę na Interię »